شارع عبد المقصود خوجة
جدة - الروضة

00966-12-6982222 - تحويلة 250
00966-12-6984444 - فاكس
                  البحث   

مكتبة الاثنينية

 
Example of Medinan Literary Activity in the Eleventh/Seventeenth Century
 
Before examining the available literary productions of Medinan intellectuals of the twelfth/eighteenth century, their value and what kind of criticism is appropriate to their centents, it will be useful to give some consideration ti the available and famous works of the Medinan intellectuals of the preceding, eleventh/seventeenth century. This precursory century naturally had its effects on the literary production of the centuty which followed, the century which in its various aspects forms the main content of our study. A glimpse of the literary activity of the preceding century is also appropriate in view of the fact that the twelfth/eighteenth century was a relatively gloomy period of time, so that it has been generally avoided by the majority of academic scholarship.
 
As examples of eleventh/seventeenth-century literature, I have chosen two major works as illustrative and introductory to the period with which we are concerned. The first of these works deals with literary history and is entitled Sulāfat al-CAsr fī Mahāsin al-ShuCarā' bi-kull Misr and was composed by CAlī khān (1) .
 
In his introduction to al-Sulāfa, CAlī stated his aim of writing biographies of the poets of the eleventh/seventeenth century, following the pattern set by the earlier works of "al-ThaCālibī (2) (in Yatīmat al-Dahr) and al-Bākharzī (3) (in Dumyat al-Qasr). Nevertheless, he hesitated in proceeding with his book until the work of al-Khafājī (Rayhānat al-Alibbā) was sent to him from Mecca. Thereafter he wrote al-Sulāfa as a supplement to al-Rayhāna, but he omitted from his own work the poetical works which were already contained in al-Rayhāna, even though he had sometimes to repeat the biographies of the poets mentioned in the latter work. The author arranged his work by regions, so that the first part deals with the works of the intellectuals of Mecca and Medina, the second part with the intellectuals of Bilād al-Shām and Egypt, the third part with Yemen, the fourth part with Persia, Bahrain, and Iraq, and the fifth part with the Maghreb.
 
We shall look briefly at the second chapter of the first part of al-Sulāfa, which deals with the Medinan intellectuals in the eleventh/seventeenth century and covers. P.249-289 of the edition referred to above (4) . From these pages we may draw a number of conclusions which throw some light on the state of literature in Medina during this period. These conclusions may be summarized as follows.
(1) The author concentrated on certain family groups, recording for instance the works of members of the Banū Shaqdam al-Husaynī family (5) , members of the Khatīb (preacher) Ilyās family (6) , and members of al-CIsāmī family. Some of these families were immigrants to Medina from various Arab provinces, like some members of al-Tarābulsī family from Tripoli (Bilād al-shām), the BākurāC al-Hadramī family from Hadramawt, and al-CIsāmī family from Mecca.
 
(2) The biographies of this chapter are not exclusively those of poets, but include also some preachers or historians. These were apparently incorporated because they composed occasional verses (7) , which might not be considered of high quality, showing that author did not work by any critical criteria to identify good productions from bad ones.
 
(3) Most of these biographoes are somewhat lacking in details of the early life and educational experience of the subjects treated and, since the author stated in his introduction to his book that he intended to follow the method adopted by al-Tha Cālibī in Yatīmat al-Dahr, the later must also incur some criticism (8) .
 
(4) The author's tendency in this chapter is to select a certain species of poetry. His interest ranges over verses which were composed in praise of his own father, Nizām al-Dīn Ahmad ibn MaCsūm (9) , and the poems the latter exchanged with some of his contemporaties who lived in Medina, such as al-Khatīb Ahmad ibn CAbd Allāh al-Barrī al-Hanafī (10) . Other selections include the popular genre of that period, which was the eulogy of famous men. Thus we have eulogy of the Prophet Muhammad, as in the poem of al-Sayyid Husayn ibn CAlī ibn Hasan ibn Shaqdam al-Husaynī (11) , eulogy of certain Culamā', as in the poem of Muhammad ibn kibrīt (12) on the Istanbul Shaykh al-Islām Yahyā ibn Zakariyā (13) , and eulogy of certain rulers and leaders, such as the poem of al-Shaykh Darwīsh ibn Mustafā ibn Qāsim al-Tarābulsī on the occasion of the visit (14) of Zayd ibn Muhsin the Sultan of Mecca (15) , and the poem of Fath Allāh al-Nahhās in praise of the Amīr al-Hajj al-Shāmī (16) Muhammad ibn Farrūkhs (17) .
 
(5) While Ibn MaCsūm recorded the literary productions of Medina's intellectuals throughout this chapter of al-Sulāfa, he revealed his own poetical education in many places, as in the biography of al-Khatīb Ahmad al-Barrī, who exchanged some poems with the author’s father. Ibn MaCsūm reckoned that the meaning of one line (18) of al-Barrī's poem was taken from a poem (19) attributed to Abū al-Hasan Muhammad al-Salāmī (20) , which he composed in praise of CAdud al-Dawla ibn Buwayh (21) . Again, in the biography of Fath Allāh al-Nahhās, Ibn MaCsūm referred to a line contained in one of al-Nahhās' poems (22) attributed to the poet Suhaym CAbd Banī al-Hashās (23) .
 
Having in the above paragraphs reviewed briefly one of the major literary-historical works produced by as Medina intellectual of the eleventh/seventeenth century and having paid particular attention to the chapter concerning Medinan intellectuals, we turn now to one of those intellectuals who contributed to the literary movement of Medina during that period, the famous writer known as Ibn Kibrīt al-Madanī, whose biographical details have already been recorded above in connection with our study of Ibn MaCsūm’s al-Sulāfa (24) . One of the important workes of Ibn Kibrīt was written in the field of history and lavishly illustrated with poetic examples. However, before we classify the subjects of this historical work of make any critical comments about its contents, it is appropriate first to give some attention to other works of the famous historians of Medina, produced during the centuries preceding Ibn Kibrīt's time (25) .
 
One of these famous works was al-Durrat al-Thamīna fī Akhbār al-Madīna by Muhammad ibn Mahmūd ibn al-Hasan ibn Hibat Allāh ibn Mahāsin al-Baghdādī (26) . His book on the history of Medina is referred to by F. Rosenthal as follows: "On (Medina's) praise (fada'il), relics, and monuments, there is Muhibb-ad-dîn b. an-Najjâr, ad-Durrah at-tamînah fî Akhbar al-Madînah. A supplement to (the Durrah) of one quire was written by Abû l-CAbbâs al-Garrâqî" (27) . In his Wafā', al-Samhūdī cited Ibn al-Najjār in al-Durra in about 54 places. He also cited twice the Dhayl (appendix) of Abū al-CAbbās al-CIrāqī. H. al-Jāsir confirmed that a copy of the Dhayl was availableto al-Samhūdī and that he would have been able to use it in composing his Wafā' (28) . Al-Durrat al-Thamīna fī Akhbār al-Madīna was published many times, but without editing. The first edition was in 1366/1946, and the third was in 1401/1981 under the title Akhbār Madīnat al-Rasūl. The publisher of both these Meccan editions was Sālih Muhammad Jamāl (Maktabat al-Thaqāfa).
 
Another work was Jamāl al-Dīn Muhammad al-Matarī al-Ansārī al-Khazrajī al-CAbbādī's (29) al-TaCrīf bi-mā Ānasat al-Hijra min MaCālim Dār al-Hijra. Rosenthal described this book on the history of Medina as an instructive work (30) . Al-Samhūdī, in his Wafā', cited al-Matarī in about 124 places. Al-Matarī's work was published by AsCad Darābazūnī al-Husaynī in 1372/1952, but without comparing variant manuscript copies of the book. Among the many copies scattered in different libraries, I have seen two in Dār al-Kutub al-Qawmiyya in Cairo, under the numbers 21 and 064 (history).
 
Another work on the history of medina was CAbd Allāh ibn Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn Farhūn al-YaCmurī al-Mālikī's (31) Nasīhat al-Mushāwir wa-TaCziyyat al-Mujāwir, a one-volume work containing the biographies of a number of Medinans (32) . S. Jamāl listed al-Nasīha among the sources on the history of Medina which have not yet been discovered (33) (but see below). CAbd al-Wahhāb Abū Sulaymān gave the same notice concerning Ibn Farhūn's work (34) . H. al-Jāsir stated that al-Samhūdī consulted Ibn Farhūn's work during the composition of his own Wafa' (35) . I have discovered that al-Samhūdī quoted Ibn Farhūn in about 21 places, introducing these quotations with the words, "al-Badr Ibn Farhūn said…" A manuscript copy of Ibn Farhūn's unpublished work was made available to me in CĀrif Hikmat Library in Medina, no. 797 (history). On the verso of the titlepage, it is recorded that this copy was endowed to the Library in 1368/1948. The book, which is in 276 pages, is devoted to the biographies of the nobles of Medina during the writer's time, including mashā'ikh (chiefs) of the servants of the Prophet’s Mosque (36) , al-mujāwirūn al-qudamā' (the old immigrants), al-mu’adhdhinūn (announcers of the prayer), al-khutabā' (preachers), al-qudāt (judges), al-a'imma (prayer leaders), and umarā' (governors). Occasionally, the author also refers to some events in the wider Islamic world, such as the rule of the Fātimids and the battles between Salāh al-Dīn and the Crusaders. Ibn Farhūn completed his book with a small chapter on his own family which had an Andalusian origin, as was noted in his nephew's biography (37) . His father emigrated from Tunisia to Medina, where he married a daughter of al-Sharīf CAbd al-Wāhid al Husaynī. Ibn Farhūn confirmed that he himself was born on the 6th Jamādā II, 693/1294.
 
Abū Bakr ibn al-Husayn ibn CUmar al-Qurashī al-CAbshamī al-Umawī al-CUthmānī al-Marāqī al-Misrī al-ShāfiCī's (38) work on the history of Medina, Tahqīq al-Nusra bi-Talkhīs MaCālim Dār al-Hijra, was cited by al-Samhūdī in his Wafā' in about 29 places. Al-Ziriklī noted that his Tahqīq was published in Cairo by Būshar, but the only edition of this book I have seen was published by Muhammad al-Nimnakānī in Medina in 1374/1955. It claimed to be the first edition and was edited by Muhammad Jawād al-AsmaCī, based on two manuscripts found in Dār al-Kutub al-Misriyya under the numbers 59 and 1614 (history). The two copies have been made available to me. That which is numbered 59 was copied in Medina in 766/1364. Among the many other copies of this work, the one in the British Library (or.3615) concludes with the author's statement that he completed his book on Saturday the 12th Rajab 766/1364. Two further copies of the Tahqīq are found in the Bodleian Library, Oxford, under the numbers 415 and 527. Another two copies exist in al-Haram al-Makkī Library in Mecca. One is under the number 121, in al-Dihlawī Collection, and was copied in 1241/1825; the other is under the number 110, copied in 1092/1681, and used to belong to al-Sharīf CAbd al-Muttalib. Still another copy of this work I have obtained from the Topkapi Saray Müzesi Kütüphanesi (39) .
 
Abū al-Tāhir Muhammad ibn YaCqūb ibn Muhammad ibn Ibrāhīm Majd al-Dīn al-ShāfīCī al-Shīrāzī al-Fīrūzābādī (40) also wrote a history of Medina under the title al-Maghānim al-Mutāba fī MaCālim Tāba. H. Jāsir, who edited one volume of the work, al-qism al-jughrāfī (41) , stated that the remainder was still unpublished, but he added that al-Samhūdī, in his Wafā', depended largely on al-Fīrūzābādī's work, quoting from him profusely and either adding some new information of correcting al- Fīrūzābādī's text (42) . I have counted 112 citations from al- Fīrūzābādī's work in al-Samhūdī's Wafā', each citation introduced by the phrase qāla al-Majd…" ("al-Majd said…"). In his introduction to the geographical section of al-Maghānim, al- Jāsir stated that this published part of the book was the longest chapter of the book, in which the author depended on Yāqūt’s MuCjam al-Buldān, but tried occasionally to correct the mistakes which he found in Yāqūt's work (43) . In other places, however, he repeated Yāqūt's mistakes (44) , but also sought to add new information to what he cited from Yāqūt's (45) .
 
Having now reviewed these earlier historians of Medina, we come now to consider al-Jawāhir al-Thamīna fī Mahāsin al-Madinā by al-Sayyid Muhammad Ibn Kibrīt al-Madanī. In this work Ibn Kibrīt has followed closely the method of previous Medinan historians, like al-Matarī, al-Marāghī, and al-Samhūdī in recording the traditional information concerning Medina's mosque, mountains, valleys, wells of water, etc., with relevant quotations in their places (46) . However, he also tried to describe the present state of some places as they had become in his own time (47) .
 
Ibn Kibrīt took pains to record the actual dates when things were established in the city, especially items related to water sources, since a city like Medina depended principally for its economic life on agriculture, which in turn depended on the available water sources (48) .
 
Ibn Kibrīt also took an interest in describing the agricultural seasons of the city of Medina and showing how they related to the months and seasons of the year. It is not surprising that he should take such an interest, since we learn from biographical details relating to him that he himself owned some gardens on the outskirts of the city of Medina and that he wrote a book on agriculture entitled Kitāb al-Filāha (49) . It is evident from this that Ibn Kibrīt was one of the Medinan intellectuals whose knowledge and writings covered many fields, so that his contribution deserves to be examined and reviewed from a number of angles and in some breadth.
 
He reveals in this work his particular interest in literature by recording poetical quotations, especially in his study of famous sites in Medina (50) . Among these quotations, attributed to different poets of various ages, Ibn Kibrīt recorded some Sufi lines (51) expressing religious longing for the sacred city and for the revered Prophet, which he attributed to al-Sayyid Ahmad al-RifāCī (52) .
The later historian of Medina, al-Sayyid JaCfar al-Barzanjī (53) , who finished composing his book on Medina's history on the 23rd Dhū al-QaCda 1287/1870, cited some of these religious verses in praise of the Prophet Muhammad, or expressing passionate feeling towards the city (54) . He cited Ibn Kibrīt again in other places, but with some occasional criticism, as in the case of the history of a certain prayerniche, al-Mihrāh al-Sulaymānī. Al-Barzanjī insisted that the mihrāb, was not a part of the building expansion work which took place under the second Caliph CUmar ibn al-Khattāb, as Ibn Kibrīt had recorded, but was established rather by Tūghān Shaykh, after the year 860/1455. Al-Barzanjī described Ibn Kibrīt's record in this matter as very weak (55) .
 
 
طباعة
 القراءات :286  التعليقات :0
 

الصفحة الأولى الصفحة السابقة
صفحة 89 من 100
الصفحة التالية الصفحة الأخيرة

من ألبوم الصور

من أمسيات هذا الموسم

الدكتور محمد خير البقاعي

رفد المكتبة العربية بخمسة عشر مؤلفاً في النقد والفكر والترجمة.